Home | Publications | Finance / Investment place holder
place holder place holder

Finance / Investment


Financial Markets Research: ASCO Review Part II

A summary of highlights presented at the ASCO 2006 Annual Meeting

Publication Date   August 2006
Publisher   Datamonitor
Product Type   Report
Pages   14
ISBN Number   not applicable
Product Code   DAT00542
Ask a question about this product?

Price £2,195.00

approximately: $3,207 | €2,406

Summary


Introduction

ASCO features key presentations in the oncology area, and is generally the most important week of the year for oncology. Presents Datamonitor's comments on the most important events at the 2006 conference.

Highlights

Continuing a disappointing weekend, Nexavar was unable to show a statistically significant survival benefit in second-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in an update from the trial that led to its FDA approval. But, we believe that reports that Nexavar has 'failed' to show a survival benefit appear to be misleading.We note that while data presented at ASCO has given Sutent frontrunner status in first-line therapy in RCC, results from trials examining various targeted agents have suggested that these therapies may be used sequentially in metastatic disease.Results of numerous trials in multiple myeloma (MM) with Thalomid, Revlimid, and Velcade proved overwhelmingly positive, with high efficacy and superiority over standard regimens in both front-line and later-line settings. The optimal regimen is being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials, from which we expect data to emerge over the next two years.

Scope

  • A summary of highlights presented at ASCO 2006 on Monday June 4, 2006, as well as information on related presentations from earlier in the conference
  • Drugs covered include Celgene's Thalomid (thalidomide) & Revlimid (lenalidomide), Genentech's Avastin (bevacizumab), Millennium's Velcade (bortezomib)h3>

Reasons to Purchase

  • Identify the most important events that occurred at ASCO 2006h3>
  • Understand the impact of key data presentations on the potential future dynamics of the oncology market

Content


  • Summary
  • Gsk's Lapatinib And Bmy's Dasatinib Are The Early Stars
  • Asco Coverage
  • Key highlights
  • Tykerb (Lapatinib) Highlights
  • Gsk's Lapatinib Living Up To Hype In Breast Cancer
  • Fda Approval Likely, But More Phase Iii Success Needed To Maximize Market
  • Lapatinib disappoints in renal cell carcinoma
  • Subset analysis provides hope, but with reduced patient potential
  • Highlights In Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
  • Following recommendation for FDA approval, presented data confirms Sprycel (dasatinib) efficacy in chronic myeloid leukemia
  • Dasatinib possibly more effective than high dose Gleevec
  • Will dasatinib eventually become first-line therapy?
  • Dasatinib maintains its lead on potential competitor, Novartis's AMN107
  • Highlights In Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Sorafenib vs. Sutent battle continues in the abstract
  • Lack of sorafenib front-line data paves way for Sutent success
  • Wyeth drug may find niche in poor-risk patients after demonstrating survival benefit
  • Smaller studies underscore advances in renal cell carcinoma
  • Erbitux (Cetuximab) Highlights
  • Strong Erbitux data suggests expanding role as companies brace for competition
  • Front-line data interesting, but lack of Avastin leaves physicians looking forward to 2007
  • Erbitux ready to advance in NSCLC
  • Highlights In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Frontrunner yet to emerge in next wave of targeted NSCLC therapies; success will likely require combination therapy
  • Zactima
  • Sutent
  • Nexavar
  • Summary
  • Denosumab Highlights
  • Phase II data positive for denosumab but phase III trial needed
  • Denosumab appears at least equal to Novartis's Zometa in the treatment of bone metastases
  • Too early to tell whether denosumab will cause osteonecrosis, but no cases have occurred yet
  • Denosumab could become mainstay of bone metastases treatment but filing likely a long way off
  • Appendix
    • Datamonitor Healthcare
    • Disclosure information
    • Ask the analyst